Monday, July 05, 2010

人手 Bookmark


mono says: (4:31:29 PM)
u do stereo XY miking all the time?

Jay says: (4:31:48 PM)
no why?

mono says: (4:31:59 PM)
just curious

Jay says: (4:32:20 PM)
我们老师说过一句话,我一直记着

mono says: (4:32:32 PM)
always wanna know how to working perfectly with matched pair

Jay says: (4:33:00 PM)
你能抱住的乐器都是mono 乐器,stereo miking 的话就会失真

Jay says: (4:33:28 PM)
i really really seldom stereo mik guitar

mono says: (4:33:39 PM)
!!! 相位失真 or ?

Jay says: (4:33:43 PM)
if ONLY, time is not enough for me to overdub

Jay says: (4:33:59 PM)
then i will have to stereo mic them for it

mono says: (4:34:39 PM)
ic....but recording with 2 mics in different position is another story ?

Jay says: (4:34:42 PM)
小的乐器对观众的耳朵来说本身就是mono 乐器

Jay says: (4:34:58 PM)
不应该stereo mic

mono says: (4:35:08 PM)
ic....

Jay says: (4:35:16 PM)
这样想,如果你想吉他更big

Jay says: (4:35:24 PM)
两把吉他一起弹

Jay says: (4:35:32 PM)
in production situation

mono says: (4:35:38 PM)
好有啟發性

Jay says: (4:35:50 PM)
two guitar signal play the same part , pan left and right

mono says: (4:36:08 PM)
我見好多人收兩支咪加 line-in

Jay says: (4:36:10 PM)
而不氏stereo mic 然后两个signal pan left right

Jay says: (4:36:34 PM)
那是找音色,不一定全用

mono says: (4:36:42 PM)
ic!!!!

Jay says: (4:36:50 PM)
你看到一些图片,录鼓用10几支mic,

Jay says: (4:37:02 PM)
很多人就以为这样才好

Jay says: (4:37:08 PM)
不是的

mono says: (4:37:10 PM)
yes! snare 用三支

Jay says: (4:37:15 PM)
他们只是在找音色

Jay says: (4:37:24 PM)
他们不时全部mic的signal都用的

mono says: (4:37:49 PM)
ic!

Jay says: (4:37:54 PM)
鼓永远越少mic 音色越不失真

Jay says: (4:38:18 PM)
他们在听那一组mic 最好而已

mono says: (4:38:21 PM)
原來一真走錯方向

Jay says: (4:38:21 PM)
不是全部都用

Jay says: (4:39:09 PM)
mic 越多,phase 问题越多,也就会失真,严重的话就会没有了body

Jay says: (4:40:07 PM)


Jay says: (4:40:15 PM)
overhead 是主要mic

Jay says: (4:40:33 PM)
地鼓是第二

Jay says: (4:40:41 PM)
其它都是有必要才用

Jay says: (4:40:54 PM)
例如

Jay says: (4:41:19 PM)
要snare上的某个位置的音色,加一个做补偿

mono says: (4:41:20 PM)
明白! band 房的咪可以賣了

Jay says: (4:41:44 PM)
要snare下面的rass 的音色,加一个mic

Jay says: (4:41:53 PM)
反正要记住

Jay says: (4:42:00 PM)
mic 越小越好

mono says: (4:42:00 PM)
snare 很難錄得好

Jay says: (4:42:12 PM)
然后就考验你miking的技术

Jay says: (4:42:18 PM)
还有房间的条件

mono says: (4:42:37 PM)
通常太尖太衝又唔立體

mono says: (4:42:51 PM)
miking的技术.........對

Jay says: (4:43:10 PM)
任何录音,都必须看你的live room

Jay says: (4:43:25 PM)
overhead 是主要的mic

Jay says: (4:43:32 PM)
录的不仅仅是鼓

Jay says: (4:43:37 PM)
更多的其实是录房间

Jay says: (4:43:50 PM)
yea?

mono says: (4:44:08 PM)
明白了!

mono says: (4:44:34 PM)
咁我地 band 房是死証了

Jay says: (4:45:01 PM)
房间的空间影响着乐器的放声

mono says: (4:45:25 PM)
收 overhead 是一條 stereo 還是 dual mono 好呢?

Jay says: (4:45:30 PM)
因为不同空间会跟乐器的某段freq会有boost

Jay says: (4:45:58 PM)
没有不同吧,stereo 和dual mono 都是2 signal

Jay says: (4:46:06 PM)
只是stereo 更好mix

Jay says: (4:46:15 PM)
我们都会用stereo

mono says: (4:46:17 PM)
不用 group

Jay says: (4:46:27 PM)
不过,不同情况而定

Jay says: (4:46:36 PM)
例如

Jay says: (4:46:49 PM)
需要创意的时候,当然你也许2 mono 更能发挥

Jay says: (4:46:54 PM)


Jay says: (4:47:03 PM)
用group

mono says: (4:47:16 PM)
ic! 有時候覺得 dual mono 好 pan 點

Jay says: (4:47:35 PM)
你必须找到你们的live room 录鼓的最好的位置

Jay says: (4:47:52 PM)
pan law 是一样的

Jay says: (4:48:00 PM)
据我所知,没有不同

Jay says: (4:48:15 PM)
然后

Jay says: (4:48:23 PM)
要记住一些逻辑问题

Jay says: (4:48:28 PM)
有人会mix drums的时候

Jay says: (4:48:39 PM)
overhead pan hard left and right

mono says: (4:48:52 PM)
thatz me

Jay says: (4:48:55 PM)
实际演出,鼓根本就没有那么大

Jay says: (4:49:12 PM)
你明白我的意思吗?

mono says: (4:49:21 PM)
yes!

Jay says: (4:49:36 PM)
正常(非创意)的情况,不应该hard pan

mono says: (4:49:37 PM)
反而散了

Jay says: (4:51:13 PM)
太多了

Jay says: (4:51:36 PM)
我跟你说的 是学校的知识还有我的经验

Jay says: (4:51:44 PM)
你要自己再推敲

mono says: (4:52:06 PM)
謝謝!

Jay says: (4:52:08 PM)
我可以再跟你说一个

Jay says: (4:52:25 PM)
snare 和kick 是鼓的主要乐器

Jay says: (4:52:43 PM)
主要的东西(正常情况) 都必须在mix的中间

Jay says: (4:52:44 PM)
但是

Jay says: (4:53:20 PM)
snare 很多人录出来之后,在mix里都会有点偏

Jay says: (4:54:00 PM)
因为他们overhead 没有measure 距离

Jay says: (4:54:08 PM)
你有measure 距离的习惯吗?

Jay says: (4:54:45 PM)
snare的声音传去两支不同距离的mic,

Jay says: (4:54:58 PM)
那两支mic收到的signal 就会有delay

Jay says: (4:55:10 PM)
就会偏

Jay says: (4:55:21 PM)
人的耳朵的law里面

mono says: (4:55:42 PM)
oh! 從沒有measure

Jay says: (4:55:47 PM)
是靠delay 来确定方向的

Jay says: (4:56:08 PM)
你可以自己回家试试

Jay says: (4:56:18 PM)
两个相通的signal

Jay says: (4:56:23 PM)
pan hard left right

mono says: (4:56:23 PM)
還以為那只是 reverb......

Jay says: (4:56:37 PM)
其中一个加sample delay

Jay says: (4:56:49 PM)
你回家试试

Jay says: (4:56:57 PM)
那是人耳的pan law

Jay says: (4:57:11 PM)
所以

mono says: (4:57:13 PM)
好! 謝謝!

Jay says: (4:57:26 PM)
overhead 的距离要一致

mono says: (4:57:50 PM)
那 snare track 要拉早幾 ms 嗎?

Jay says: (4:58:12 PM)
跟snare track 没有关系

Jay says: (4:58:32 PM)
是两支距离不一样的overhead 导致snare 偏移

mono says: (4:58:39 PM)
距離是 mic 與 mic 的距離 ?

Jay says: (4:58:50 PM)
mic 和source的距离

Jay says: (4:59:00 PM)
snare track 是mono

Jay says: (4:59:16 PM)
snare track pan centre 那当然一定在centre

mono says: (4:59:27 PM)
yes!

Jay says: (5:00:11 PM)
两支overhead 跟source的距离不一样,有delay 造成了在mix里drum 的source有偏移

Jay says: (5:00:36 PM)
其它instrument 例如hihat 和 cymbals 等等有偏移没有关系

Jay says: (5:00:59 PM)
但是overhead 录到的主要乐器:snare 必须保留在centre

Jay says: (5:01:27 PM)
你要做measurement 才能保证snare 在centre

mono says: (5:01:32 PM)
那兩支 overhead mic 跟 snare 成等邊三角形 ?

Jay says: (5:02:29 PM)
保证overhead mic 和snare的距离一样就行了

mono says: (5:03:01 PM)
明白! 這非常有用!!

Jay says: (5:03:01 PM)
然后摆法有很多种

Jay says: (5:03:04 PM)
最出名的是

Jay says: (5:03:14 PM)
glnn johns technique

Jay says: (5:03:20 PM)
3支mic 录鼓

Jay says: (5:03:25 PM)
kick, overhead

Jay says: (5:03:38 PM)
一直overhead 在snare 正上方

Jay says: (5:04:05 PM)
一支在floor tom 附近 facing snare

Jay says: (5:04:07 PM)
你google

mono says: (5:04:36 PM)
googling now

Jay says: (5:04:45 PM)
这样那支mic就能很好地也录到floor 和ride

Jay says: (5:05:07 PM)
记住,works in different application

Jay says: (5:05:13 PM)
不同情况,不同处理方法

Jay says: (5:05:16 PM)
要经验

Jay says: (5:06:06 PM)
马上说完

Jay says: (5:06:17 PM)
学会了之后

Jay says: (5:06:24 PM)
升level

mono says: (5:06:32 PM)
http://www.wikirecording.org/thumb.php?f=Glyn_Johns_Mic_Placement.JPG&width=300

Jay says: (5:06:41 PM)
就要考虑overhead 和live room 的墙的距离

mono says: (5:06:56 PM)
好想試下

Jay says: (5:07:00 PM)
yup

Jay says: (5:07:20 PM)
用多mic 来录鼓那是绝对的错误

Jay says: (5:08:01 PM)
不过用少mic 录鼓要有miking techique

Jay says: (5:08:50 PM)
就要考虑overhead 和live room 的墙的距离,因为其实overhead旁边的墙,通过snare的声音反弹,也是一个sound source

mono says: (5:08:58 PM)
一直以為 Overhead + kick mic 成 Y 形是 standard

Jay says: (5:09:49 PM)
所以,为什么live room 越大越好,

Jay says: (5:09:54 PM)
你明白了吗?

mono says: (5:10:29 PM)
yeah! 更多反射擴散

Jay says: (5:10:39 PM)
大的话,房间的墙的反弹越少,recording就越干净

Jay says: (5:10:42 PM)
嗯!

Jay says: (5:10:57 PM)
所以

Jay says: (5:11:26 PM)
房子小不可能录到好的鼓声,小的房子更不应该用多mic 录乐器

Jay says: (5:11:40 PM)
反弹多,phase问题就多

Jay says: (5:11:53 PM)
comb filtering

mono says: (5:12:10 PM)
以前錯覺以為大空間會變 hall revb

mono says: (5:14:14 PM)
那看 live 時見所有套件都收 mic 是用法不同還足只為好看?

Jay says: (5:14:18 PM)
如果你把mic 放在大hall的墙边,那才是hall reverb

Jay says: (5:14:26 PM)
live 是另一个问题

Jay says: (5:14:29 PM)
完全不一样

Jay says: (5:14:38 PM)
live 不太考虑音色

Jay says: (5:14:50 PM)
live 考虑 feedback,扩声

Jay says: (5:15:10 PM)
升level 就考虑mic 之间的串声

Jay says: (5:15:48 PM)
live

Jay says: (5:15:58 PM)
是一个band 的performance

mono says: (5:16:10 PM)
咁愈多 mic 咪愈多 feedback?

Jay says: (5:16:16 PM)
overhead 的目的就不是

Jay says: (5:16:23 PM)
录一套鼓了

Jay says: (5:16:31 PM)
是收cymbals

mono says: (5:17:24 PM)
ic...用法不同

Jay says: (5:17:29 PM)
非常不一样

Jay says: (5:17:44 PM)
如果你是录live recording 也不一样

Jay says: (5:18:09 PM)
recording 追求的是每一个signal的干净

mono says: (5:18:27 PM)


Jay says: (5:18:44 PM)
live 的话就要考虑如何保持在band live的同时,每一个mic录出来都是clean,没有别的乐器的

Jay says: (5:18:51 PM)
这是main goal

Jay says: (5:19:05 PM)
live sound不是

Jay says: (5:20:04 PM)
我错了

Jay says: (5:20:15 PM)
live sound 也是,但是那不是第一位考虑的

mono says: (5:20:18 PM)
咁 live miking 咪好難?

Jay says: (5:20:29 PM)
你说live recording 是不是

Jay says: (5:20:30 PM)


mono says: (5:20:42 PM)
yes

Jay says: (5:20:53 PM)
嗯 live recording,对engineer和players 都难

Jay says: (5:21:10 PM)
那是高水平的东西,不是人人都能搞好

mono says: (5:21:21 PM)
串 mic 和 feedback

Jay says: (5:21:25 PM)
没有能力,不应该搞live recording

mono says: (5:21:30 PM)
夠死了

Jay says: (5:21:38 PM)
嗯 lol

mono says: (5:21:59 PM)
BBC 強項

Jay says: (5:23:14 PM)
bbc 强项太多了
J
ay says: (5:23:55 PM)
英国在recording industry的强项也太多了

mono says: (5:24:45 PM)
聽 the smith 的 BBC sessions....跟 studio album 一樣!!!!

Jay says: (5:24:47 PM)
我真的从他们身上学到了很多很多宝贵的技术

Jay says: (5:25:02 PM)


Jay says: (5:25:17 PM)
我相信将来的中国也可以

Jay says: (5:25:29 PM)
我有很强的使命感

mono says: (5:26:30 PM)
hahaha! 可能你遲D會買台 SSL AWS900 自用
J
ay says: (5:26:42 PM)
no

Jay says: (5:27:07 PM)
到我能买aws900的时候世界可能都变了 哈哈

Jay says: (5:27:13 PM)
anyway 我更喜欢neve

mono says: (5:27:30 PM)
!!!!更貴!!!

Jay says: (5:27:40 PM)
:$

Jay says: (5:28:18 PM)
玩analogue 本来就很贵

Jay says: (5:28:29 PM)
我也只是奢想

Jay says: (5:28:31 PM)
哈哈

mono says: (5:28:37 PM)
我連 1073 的 plug-in 也買不起 :$

mono says: (5:31:09 PM)
analog mixing...恐怕我一輩子也碰不到

Jay says: (5:32:52 PM)
为什么

Jay says: (5:33:12 PM)
你们band sum up 钱去租一个studio 就可以啦

mono says: (5:33:49 PM)
都是 pro tools 的世界了

Jay says: (5:34:16 PM)
是pro tools

Jay says: (5:34:37 PM)
analogue 的世界里,也有pro tools

mono says: (5:34:43 PM)
尤其講成本效益的香港

Jay says: (5:34:49 PM)
pro tools 更像一个recorder

Jay says: (5:34:52 PM)


mono says: (5:35:00 PM)
oh? 不用過 AD/DA?

Jay says: (5:35:08 PM)
当然过addc

Jay says: (5:35:11 PM)
adda

Jay says: (5:35:25 PM)
ad - pro tools - da

Jay says: (5:35:54 PM)
mixer - ad - pro tools - da - mixer - speakers

Jay says: (5:36:21 PM)
and patchbay with outboards

Jay says: (5:36:36 PM)
这是现在的analogue studio

mono says: (5:36:41 PM)
還以為 PT 能用 tape:$

Jay says: (5:36:53 PM)
我说得不清楚

mono says: (5:37:38 PM)
我自己也有低成本 summing

Jay says: (5:37:52 PM)
哈哈

Jay says: (5:38:02 PM)
你自己买了一个summing machine?

mono says: (5:38:03 PM)
跟 rendering 差太多了

mono says: (5:38:30 PM)
TL Audio 的 5060

Jay says: (5:38:50 PM)
summing machine 在国外很有争议

Jay says: (5:39:00 PM)
不说了

Jay says: (5:39:09 PM)
i need to get off now mono

mono says: (5:39:16 PM)
ok!

0 comments: